Section 42 compliance under narcotics law is mandatory; unexplained delay in recording information vitiated the prosecution case.

Section 42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 requires information of the relevant kind to be reduced into writing and forwarded to a superior officer before search and seizure, unless emergent circumstances justify a satisfactorily explained delay. Here, the information was available in time, but it was not recorded at the first opportunity and no adequate explanation was given. The prosecution case was further weakened by the non-examination of independent witnesses and by seizure papers being prepared later at the police station. Total non-compliance with Section 42 was therefore fatal, and the conviction and sentence could not be sustained; the accused was entitled to acquittal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 could be sustained despite non-compliance with the requirements of Section 42 concerning recording of information and communicating it to the superior officer before search and seizure.

Analysis: The governing principle is that information of the kind covered by Section 42(1) should ordinarily be reduced into writing and forwarded to the superior officer before entry, search and seizure. A limited exception exists where emergent circumstances make prior compliance impracticable, in which case delayed compliance may be accepted if satisfactorily explained. On the facts, the information was received in time, yet it was not recorded at the first available opportunity and no adequate explanation was offered for the delay. The credibility of the prosecution case was further weakened by the non-examination of independent witnesses and by the preparation of papers, including seizure memos, only later at the police station.

Conclusion: The non-compliance with Section 42 was fatal to the prosecution case, and the conviction and sentence could not be sustained. The accused was entitled to acquittal.

Ratio Decidendi: Total non-compliance with Section 42 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is impermissible, and where prior recording and communication of information are not shown to have been complied with or validly deferred in a justified emergent situation, the conviction cannot stand.

---