https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457174 The SC set aside the conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with Section 42. The investigating officer failed to promptly record and communicate information, leading to credibility issues. The Court ordered acquittal, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements to protect accused rights in narcotics cases. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Sep 2024 20:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457174 The SC set aside the conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with Section 42. The investigating officer failed to promptly record and communicate information, leading to credibility issues. The Court ordered acquittal, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements to protect accused rights in narcotics cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457174