TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and the matter restored for fresh adjudication on the assessee's claim for interest deduction in computing income from house property; (ii) Whether, for determining annual value under section 23, vacancy allowance can be claimed for a separately lettable, but unlet, seventh floor of a commercial building.
Issue (i): Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned and the matter restored for fresh adjudication on the assessee's claim for interest deduction in computing income from house property
Analysis: The appeal was delayed, but the explanation for non-receipt or non-notice of the appellate order was accepted, especially in view of the opted mode of communication and the surrounding facts. Since the first appellate order was ex parte and did not result in an adjudication on merits, restoration was considered appropriate so that the claim could be examined afresh by the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned and the issue relating to interest deduction was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Issue (ii): Whether, for determining annual value under section 23, vacancy allowance can be claimed for a separately lettable, but unlet, seventh floor of a commercial building
Analysis: Section 23 was read as a whole. Annual value is normally the notional rent reasonably expected on a year-to-year basis under clause (a), while clauses (b) and (c) operate only where the property is actually let and the rent received or receivable varies because of actual letting or vacancy. Vacancy allowance was held to presuppose actual letting, and not mere non-letting of a separately capable unit. The unlet seventh floor, being independently lettable, could not obtain the benefit of vacancy under clause (c).
Conclusion: Vacancy allowance for the seventh floor was not allowable on the facts found, and the annual value of that floor was to be computed under section 23(1)(a).
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with restoration for fresh adjudication on the interest issue, while the legal claim for vacancy allowance on the unlet seventh floor was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Vacancy allowance under section 23(1)(c) is available only when the property, or the relevant part of it, is actually let, and not where a separately lettable portion remains simply unlet.
TaxTMI 
