Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2024 (1) TMI 529 - AT - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        CoC's rejection of Section 12A withdrawal proposal offering 100% debt repayment deemed arbitrary and unsustainable NCLAT held that CoC's rejection of Section 12A withdrawal proposal was arbitrary and unsustainable. Corporate debtor's shareholders offered to provide ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            CoC's rejection of Section 12A withdrawal proposal offering 100% debt repayment deemed arbitrary and unsustainable

                            NCLAT held that CoC's rejection of Section 12A withdrawal proposal was arbitrary and unsustainable. Corporate debtor's shareholders offered to provide funds to repay 100% of debts to all creditors. Despite CoC initially expressing willingness to accept upon full deposit and granting time, they dissented within three days of the meeting. When entire amount was subsequently deposited pursuant to tribunal order, the major creditor refused acceptance, demonstrating malafide intent. NCLAT distinguished Section 12A from Section 29A, noting promoter ineligibility doesn't apply to withdrawal proposals. The decision to reject a proposal offering full debt repayment was deemed arbitrary. Appeal allowed.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Admission of Section 7 application by the Adjudicating Authority.
                            2. Substitution of JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. in place of Yes Bank.
                            3. Rejection of impleadment application by Asian Hotels (East) Ltd.
                            4. Consideration and rejection of Section 12A proposal by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

                            Summary:

                            Issue 1: Admission of Section 7 application by the Adjudicating Authority
                            The Suspended Directors and shareholders of the Corporate Debtor challenged the order dated 16.09.2022 by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT), New Delhi Bench IV, admitting the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor. The Corporate Debtor had defaulted on its financial obligations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to the filing of the Section 7 application by Yes Bank, claiming a default amount of Rs.264,07,35,129/- as on 13.08.2021. The Tribunal upheld the admission of the application, noting that the Corporate Debtor had committed defaults and the application was not an abuse of process.

                            Issue 2: Substitution of JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. in place of Yes Bank
                            The order dated 16.09.2022 also permitted JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. to be substituted in place of Yes Bank, the original Financial Creditor. The substitution was challenged but upheld by the Tribunal, noting that the substitution was in accordance with the law and the debt assignment was valid.

                            Issue 3: Rejection of impleadment application by Asian Hotels (East) Ltd.
                            Asian Hotels (East) Ltd. and shareholders of the Corporate Debtor challenged the order dated 05.08.2022, which rejected their impleadment application in the Section 7 proceedings. The Tribunal found no merit in the challenge, upholding the rejection of the impleadment application.

                            Issue 4: Consideration and rejection of Section 12A proposal by the CoC
                            The Suspended Directors and shareholders submitted a proposal under Section 12A to withdraw the Section 7 application by offering to pay the entire dues of all creditors without any haircut. The CoC initially indicated willingness to consider the proposal if the entire amount was deposited upfront. However, despite the Appellants depositing the entire amount, the CoC rejected the proposal, leading to the Tribunal's intervention.

                            The Tribunal found the CoC's decision to reject the Section 12A proposal arbitrary and unsustainable. It noted that the proposal offered to pay 100% of the dues to all creditors, including Financial Creditors, Operational Creditors, Employees, Workmen, and Government dues. The Tribunal directed the closure of the CIRP, set aside the order admitting the Section 7 application, and ordered the remittance of the deposited amount to the Resolution Professional for distribution to the creditors. The Tribunal emphasized that the CoC's refusal to accept the proposal was not in good faith and aimed at a hostile takeover of the Corporate Debtor's assets.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the appeals, accepting the Section 12A proposal, closing the CIRP, and setting aside the order admitting the Section 7 application. The amount deposited by the Appellants was directed to be distributed to the creditors, ensuring the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor's debt.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found