Tribunal Upholds Insolvency Code Decision, Stresses Commercial Considerations

The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decisions, ruling that NTPC was eligible under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code despite related entities being classified as NPAs. The CoC's rejection of the Appellant's proposal under Section 12A was deemed justified based on commercial considerations, emphasizing the CoC's commercial wisdom and non-justiciability of their decisions. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the statutory framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, ultimately dismissing the appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disqualification of the Successful Resolution Applicant under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Rejection of the Appellant's proposal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disqualification of the Successful Resolution Applicant under Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The Appellant argued that NTPC was ineligible to submit the Resolution Plan on 30.12.2019 because its related entities, RGPPL and KLL, were classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPA). According to Section 29A(c) and (j) of the Code, NTPC should have been disqualified. The eligibility of the Resolution Applicant must be assessed on the date of submission of the Resolution Plan. NTPC, being disqualified on 30.12.2019, invalidates all subsequent processes. The Appellant cited that Canara Bank classified RGPPL and KLL as NPAs on 21.05.2018, with effect from 01.04.2009. Even if NTPC claims that RGPPL and KLL settled their debts and received no due certificates, the payments were not made by NTPC, hence the proviso to Section 29A(c) does not apply.

The Respondents countered that NTPC was not disqualified under Section 29A(c) as the classification of NPAs by Canara Bank occurred on 21.05.2018, and the period of one year had not elapsed by the commencement of CIRP on 27.03.2019. The NTPC settled all dues by March 2020 and January 2021, making it eligible under Section 29A. The eligibility should be tested on the date when the Plan is placed before the CoC for consideration. The CoC unanimously approved NTPC's revised Plan, indicating compliance with Section 29A.

The Tribunal held that the date of NPA classification should be considered as 21.05.2018, not the backdate of 01.04.2009. This interpretation ensures that the grace period of one year is meaningful. Since the period of one year had not elapsed by the commencement of CIRP on 27.03.2019, NTPC was not disqualified. The Tribunal also noted that the CoC is authorized to ask for revised plans and that the commercial wisdom of the CoC is paramount.

2. Rejection of the Appellant's proposal under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Committee of Creditors (CoC):
The Appellant submitted a Restructuring/Settlement offer under Section 12A, which allows withdrawal of the application with the approval of 90% voting shares of the CoC. The Appellant claimed that the CoC arbitrarily rejected their proposal without proper consideration.

The CoC reviewed the Appellant's proposal in meetings on 05.03.2021 and 21.04.2021 and found it commercially unviable. The CoC noted that the upfront payment proposed by the Appellant was significantly lower than NTPC's offer. The CoC's decision, based on commercial wisdom, is not subject to judicial review.

The Tribunal affirmed that Section 12A proposals cannot be forced upon lenders and that the commercial wisdom of the CoC is paramount. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's judgment in K. Sashidhar vs. Indian Overseas Bank, emphasizing that the commercial decisions of the CoC are non-justiciable.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Adjudicating Authority. NTPC was found eligible under Section 29A, and the CoC's rejection of the Appellant's proposal under Section 12A was justified based on commercial considerations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the CoC's commercial wisdom and the statutory framework of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

---