Section 311 CrPC recall power supports truth-finding where additional evidence is essential to a just decision.

Section 311 CrPC gives the court wide power to recall and re-examine a witness when additional evidence is essential for a just decision. The power is aimed at discovering truth and should not be refused merely because the evidence may aid one side, the trial is advanced, or a plea of lacuna is raised. Where the omission is explainable and the material is necessary to prove disputed facts, recall may be permitted. On that basis, refusal of recall for exhibition of documents was found inconsistent with Section 311, and the revisional court set aside the impugned order and allowed recall.

---

---

Issues: Whether the prayer under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for recalling and re-examining the prosecution witness and for bringing certain documents on record ought to have been allowed as the documents were essential to the just decision of the case.

Analysis: The documents sought to be produced were said to be relevant to the disputed question whether the cheque in question had been seized by the investigating agency and to clarify the evidentiary position arising from the seizure list and the materials subsequently supplied by the CBI. Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 confers wide powers on the court to summon, recall, and re-examine a witness at any stage when the evidence is essential for a just decision. The power is guided by the need to discover the truth and is not to be refused merely on the ground that it may assist one side or that the trial had reached an advanced stage. The bar against filling up lacunae is not absolute, and where the omission is explainable and the evidence is material to the just adjudication of the case, recall may be permitted. The Court found that the documents were necessary for proper proof of relevant facts and that the refusal to allow them was not consistent with the governing principles under Section 311.

Conclusion: The rejection of the recall application was unsustainable and the prayer under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was required to be allowed in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The revisional court set aside the impugned order, permitted recall of the witness for exhibition of the documents, and directed the trial court to proceed in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: A witness may be recalled under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 whenever the additional evidence is essential to a just decision, and such power must be exercised to advance truth and justice rather than being defeated by a rigid plea of lacuna or delay.

---