TPO's expense apportionment creates double addition in transfer pricing case, depreciation rate reduced from 60% to 16%

ITAT Bangalore remanded transfer pricing adjustment issue to AO/TPO for fresh consideration, noting failure to analyze agreements, services rendered, and benchmarking methods between assessee and associated enterprises. Tribunal found TPO's 1/5th expense apportionment constituted double addition contrary to transfer pricing principles. Regarding depreciation, ITAT directed AO to allow 16% depreciation on CG/TX cards and switches instead of 60%, following coordinate bench precedent. For foreign tax credit, tribunal remanded matter to AO for verification of attributable amounts to Indian income, directing proper hearing opportunities for assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing
2. Corporate Tax - Penalty Proceedings
3. Corporate Tax - Depreciation on NMS CG/Tx Cards, Switches, etc.
4. Corporate Tax - Deduction of Tax Paid Outside India

Summary:

Transfer Pricing:
The Assessee challenged the adjustment of INR 44,32,02,099 determined by the AO/TPO/CIT(A) for its international transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) under Section 92CA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the TPO did not consider the agreements between the assessee and its AEs, the nature of transactions, and the benchmarking method consistently adopted by the assessee. The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO/TPO for a fresh analysis, emphasizing proper consideration of the agreements and functions performed by the assessee. The Tribunal also highlighted that the TPO's apportionment of expenses led to double addition, which is against transfer pricing principles. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to re-evaluate the segments under the receipt of business development services from its AE in accordance with the law, ensuring proper opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

Corporate Tax - Penalty Proceedings:
The Tribunal did not specifically address the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, as it was not a primary issue in the appeal.

Corporate Tax - Depreciation on NMS CG/Tx Cards, Switches, etc.:
The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to grant 60% depreciation on NMS CG/Tx cards, switches, etc., classifying them as "Computers." The Tribunal referred to its previous decisions in the assessee's favor for various assessment years, including the affirmation by the Karnataka High Court. The Tribunal reiterated that these items are part of computers and thus eligible for 60% depreciation. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's ground on this issue.

Corporate Tax - Deduction of Tax Paid Outside India:
The Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the deduction of tax paid outside India, arguing it falls outside the scope of Section 40(a)(ii) of the Act. The Tribunal referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., which allowed such deductions if no foreign tax credit is available. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the amount of foreign tax credit paid attributable to income accruing/arising in India and allow the deduction accordingly. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the AO for proper verification and consideration, ensuring the assessee is granted a proper hearing.

Conclusion:
The appeals filed by both the assessee and the revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific issues remanded back to the AO/TPO for re-evaluation and verification in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper consideration of agreements, business models, and adherence to transfer pricing principles, ensuring fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.

---