TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether stamp duty on issue of shares is allowable as deduction under section 35D; (ii) Whether legal and professional charges for due diligence in acquisition of Vox Mobili and for filing patent applications are revenue expenditure; (iii) Whether deduction under section 80JJAA is allowable on wages paid to eligible workmen of a software/content development undertaking; (iv) Whether deduction under section 10A is allowable to the assessee's content development and mobile value added services activity; (v) Whether media resource boards are to be treated as computers for depreciation purposes.
Issue (i): Whether stamp duty on issue of shares is allowable as deduction under section 35D.
Analysis: The expenditure on share issue included stamp duty connected with public issue of shares. The scope of section 35D was read broadly, and the items enumerated therein were treated as illustrative rather than exhaustive. The earlier distinction between capital nature and amortisation under section 35D was accepted for such expenditure.
Conclusion: The stamp duty connected with the public issue of shares was held allowable under section 35D, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Issue (ii): Whether legal and professional charges for due diligence in acquisition of Vox Mobili and for filing patent applications are revenue expenditure.
Analysis: The due diligence payment was incurred for feasibility evaluation and risk analysis before acquisition, and was treated as an ordinary business expense not resulting in acquisition of an asset. The patent filing expense was treated on the same principle as registration expenses for protecting an existing right, which do not create the patent but merely secure it. The claim was thus accepted as expenditure incurred in the course of business.
Conclusion: Both items were held to be revenue expenditure allowable under section 37(1), and the assessee succeeded on these grounds.
Issue (iii): Whether deduction under section 80JJAA is allowable on wages paid to eligible workmen of a software/content development undertaking.
Analysis: The assessee's activity was treated as an industrial undertaking engaged in software/content development, and the relevant employees were found to fall within the statutory concept of workmen. The reasoning followed the view that software development and related functions can constitute production of an article or thing for this purpose.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 80JJAA was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iv): Whether deduction under section 10A is allowable to the assessee's content development and mobile value added services activity.
Analysis: The undertaking was found to be engaged in content development and conversion of procured content into mobile-readable format, which fell within the notified category of information technology enabled services. The exported content was uploaded to servers outside India and the proceeds were received in convertible foreign exchange, satisfying the statutory conditions for deduction under section 10A.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 10A was held allowable, and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Issue (v): Whether media resource boards are to be treated as computers for depreciation purposes.
Analysis: The media resource boards were found to function only as integral devices used with the computer server, performing communication and control functions as part of the computer system. Applying the functional and integrated-use approach, the boards were treated as computer components rather than separate telecom equipment.
Conclusion: The media resource boards were held to qualify as computers for depreciation at the higher rate, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal failed in full, while the assessee obtained relief on the disputed disallowances and depreciation claim, resulting in a partial success overall for the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure integrally connected with share issuance, business due diligence, and patent protection may be deductible according to its true commercial character, and devices forming an integral part of a computer system and performing its communication or control functions are eligible for computer depreciation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
