Patent registration expenses allowed as revenue deduction under Section 37, TDS Section 195 not applicable to foreign services

ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues. Patent registration expenses for existing and new patents were held revenue in nature under Section 37. TDS provisions under Section 195 were not applicable to payments to foreign commission agents for services rendered abroad. Liquidated damages for delayed delivery/installation were treated as capital receipts not reducible from asset cost. Section 14A disallowance was restricted to assessee's suo-motto amount. Interest on tax refunds could be netted against interest on delayed tax payments. Marked-to-market losses on forward contracts were allowable following Supreme Court precedents. Carbon credit sales were characterized as capital receipts and non-taxable.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of expenses for registration of patents.
2. Disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 40a(i).
3. Disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for payments to foreign parties.
4. Taxability of liquidated damages.
5. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D.
6. Adjustment of interest on income tax dues against interest on income tax refund.
7. Deduction of employees compensation cost on account of ESOP.
8. Addition on account of unexpired discounts on forward contracts.
9. Addition of marked to market loss on forward contracts.
10. Addition of design charges as capital expenditure.
11. Addition of information technology expenses as capital expenditure.
12. Addition of advances written off.
13. Addition for double deduction of excise duty on closing stock.
14. Addition for bogus purchases.
15. Deduction u/s 80IA for captive power plant.
16. Taxability of income from sale of carbon credit units.

Summary of Judgment:

1. Disallowance of expenses for registration of patents:
The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred for registration of both existing and new patents are wholly and exclusively for business purposes and are allowable u/s 37 of the Act. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 27,095/- for new patents was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed while the revenue's appeal was dismissed.

2. Disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 40a(i):
The Tribunal found that the commission paid to foreign agents for services rendered outside India is not chargeable to tax in India, and thus, no TDS was required u/s 195. The disallowance of Rs. 7,28,07,989/- was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

3. Disallowance u/s 40a(ia) for payments to foreign parties:
The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for examination of the remittances in light of DTAA and verification of whether TDS was required. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

4. Taxability of liquidated damages:
The Tribunal held that liquidated damages received for delay in supply/installation of capital assets are capital receipts and not taxable. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

5. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D:
The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the assessee's computation of disallowance on a pro-rata basis, considering only the investments yielding exempt income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.

6. Adjustment of interest on income tax dues against interest on income tax refund:
The Tribunal allowed the adjustment, following the decision in the assessee's own case and other precedents. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

7. Deduction of employees compensation cost on account of ESOP:
The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for verification of facts and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.

8. Addition on account of unexpired discounts on forward contracts:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, following the principles of accrual accounting and AS-11. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

9. Addition of marked to market loss on forward contracts:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, recognizing the loss as a deductible business expenditure. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

10. Addition of design charges as capital expenditure:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, recognizing the expenses as revenue in nature. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

11. Addition of information technology expenses as capital expenditure:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, recognizing the expenses as revenue in nature. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

12. Addition of advances written off:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, recognizing the advances as trade advances given in the ordinary course of business. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

13. Addition for double deduction of excise duty on closing stock:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, following the decision in the assessee's own case and other precedents. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

14. Addition for bogus purchases:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, recognizing the genuineness of the purchases based on the evidence provided. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

15. Deduction u/s 80IA for captive power plant:
The Tribunal upheld the deduction, following the decision in the assessee's own case and other precedents. The revenue's appeal was dismissed.

16. Taxability of income from sale of carbon credit units:
The Tribunal held that the income from the sale of carbon credit units is a capital receipt and not taxable. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.

Conclusion:
The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the appeals of the revenue were dismissed.

---