CENVAT credit allowed for business support services and mining services with nexus to manufacturing activities

CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit eligibility for business support services and mining services. The Tribunal held that the appellant could avail CENVAT credit for business support services from a group company as these services had nexus with manufacturing activities and were essential for day-to-day operations, citing its own precedent. For mining services, the Tribunal found clear nexus between input services used in captive mines for coal extraction, electricity generation at captive power plant, and manufacturing of dutiable goods. The demands for credit reversal along with interest and penalty were set aside as unsustainable.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of the Appellant to avail CENVAT Credit of Business Support Services received from ABMCPL for the period from April 2006 to March 2016.
2. Eligibility of the Appellant to avail CENVAT Credit on Mining Services received from Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd. for the period from April 2006 to June 2011.

Summary:

Issue 1: Eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit of Business Support Services from ABMCPL

The Tribunal examined whether the Appellant could avail CENVAT Credit for Business Support Services provided by ABMCPL. The Appellant argued that ABMCPL provided common infrastructural facilities to group companies, including human resource, IT, business strategies, marketing, legal support, accounting, and training. These services were apportioned among group companies, and service tax was paid on these invoices, which the Appellant claimed as CENVAT credit.

The Tribunal referred to its previous decision in Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Kolkata-II, which established that services provided by ABMCPL qualify as Business Support Services under Section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994. It was noted that these services have a nexus with the manufacturing of goods by the Appellant and qualify as 'input services.' The Tribunal concluded that the service tax paid by ABMCPL was rightly distributed to the group companies, including the Appellant, and that CENVAT credit should not be denied when the service tax paid by the service provider is undisputed. Consequently, the demands confirmed in the impugned orders were set aside.

Issue 2: Eligibility to avail CENVAT Credit on Mining Services from Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd.

The Tribunal considered whether the Appellant could avail CENVAT Credit on mining services received from Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd. The Appellant contended that these services were used in their captive mines for generating electricity, which was then used in the manufacturing of dutiable goods. The Tribunal observed that the services had an intricate nexus with the manufacturing process and cited several decisions supporting the eligibility of input services used in captive mines for CENVAT credit.

The adjudicating authority's findings that Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd. provided 'site formation services' and not 'mining services' were deemed irrelevant by the Tribunal. It was held that the classification of services does not affect the eligibility for CENVAT credit as long as the services are used in the manufacturing process. The Tribunal also dismissed the objection regarding invoices addressed to the mines instead of the factory, stating that procedural infirmities should not lead to denial of credit if the usage of services is undisputed. Consequently, the demands for reversal of credit along with interest and penalty were set aside.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and confirming the Appellant's eligibility for CENVAT Credit on both Business Support Services from ABMCPL and Mining Services from Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd.

---