Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs and input services used in a power plant located outside the manufacturing factory was admissible where the power plant was treated as a captive power plant and part of an integrated unit with the manufacturer.
Analysis: The Majority followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in the assessee's own case and held that the power plant supplying electricity exclusively to the assessee was a captive power plant. It treated the power plant and the manufacturing unit as one integrated unit and applied the principle that input services used for generating power essential to manufacture qualify for credit. The reference to the definition of captive generating plant under Section 2(8) of the Electricity Act, 2003 supported this view. The dissent emphasized that the power plant was a separate legal entity belonging to a subsidiary, that the Cenvat Credit Rules did not provide credit to a holding company for services availed by a subsidiary, and that the cited precedents were fact-specific and not controlling on these facts.
Conclusion: Credit on the input services used at the captive power plant was admissible and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a power plant is found to be a captive plant exclusively supplying the manufacturer and functioning as an integrated unit with the manufacturing activity, input service credit used in that plant is available to the assessee.