Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether insurance service tax paid on policies covering a captive power plant, used wholly for supplying power to the manufacturer, qualifies as admissible Cenvat credit.
Analysis: The power plant was undisputedly situated at a separate location, but its entire electricity generation was supplied only to the appellant's manufacturing unit. The concept of a captive plant was treated as one generating power primarily for the owner's use, and the statutory definition of captive generating plant under section 2(8) of the Electricity Act, 2003 supported that approach. Once the power plant was accepted as a captive plant forming an integrated unit with the factory, services used for its protection, including insurance policies, were regarded as input services connected with manufacture.
Conclusion: The insurance service tax relating to the captive power plant was admissible as Cenvat credit, and the disallowance was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the credit demand, interest and penalty could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A captive power plant that wholly serves the assessee's manufacturing unit forms an integrated unit with the factory, and services used for its operation or protection are eligible input services for Cenvat credit.