Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the aqueous solution of phenolic resin, containing about 40% to 43% resin content, was an intermediate product and not resin in liquid form falling under Tariff Item 15A so as to attract excise duty.
Analysis: The product was shown by the test reports to be an aqueous solution of phenolic resin and not the final resin product. The manufacture of phenolic resin was held to be incomplete until the resin was separated from the solution by further processing such as vacuum distillation, evaporation, spray drying, or precipitation. The Court also applied the principle that goods must satisfy not only the tariff description but also the test of manufacture and marketability. Since the respondents' product remained an intermediate stage in the manufacturing process, it did not answer the description of resin in liquid form for levy purposes.
Conclusion: The aqueous solution of phenolic resin was not exigible to excise duty under Tariff Item 15A and the finding in favour of the assessee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the exemption from excise duty on the product in question was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A product remains outside excise levy where it is only an intermediate stage in manufacture and is neither complete as the final commodity nor shown to be marketable as such, even if it answers part of the tariff description.