Revenue Appeal Dismissed: M/s DCW Ltd Entitled to Full CENVAT Credit for Services in Cogeneration Plant Under Rule 6(5).

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that M/s DCW Ltd is entitled to full CENVAT credit for services used in their cogeneration plant, including electricity sold to TNEB. The Tribunal upheld the appellate authority's decision, confirming that Rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 allows full credit for specified services unless used exclusively for exempted goods. The Tribunal concluded that the Revenue's arguments lacked merit, as the services qualified as 'input services' under Rule 2(l), supporting the broader interpretation endorsed by previous HC judgments.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Entitlement to CENVAT Credit for services used in the generation of electricity and steam.
2. Applicability of Rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
3. Proportional reversal of CENVAT Credit for electricity sold to third parties.
4. Interpretation of 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Summary:

1. Entitlement to CENVAT Credit for services used in the generation of electricity and steam:

The appeal by Revenue challenged the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-I, which allowed M/s DCW Ltd to retain CENVAT credit of Rs. 34,30,643, Rs. 39,92,426, and Rs. 17,41,354 taken under Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for services provided by M/s Thermax Ltd for 'operation and maintenance' and 'goods transport agency' services. The entire production of steam and bulk of electricity was utilized in manufacturing excisable goods, with excess electricity sold to Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB).

2. Applicability of Rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:

The appellate authority accepted the plea of the assessee, citing that sub-rule (5) of Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 allows full credit of service tax paid on specified taxable services unless used exclusively for exempted goods or services. Maintenance or repair services under sub-clause 65(105)(zzg) are covered under Rule 6(5), allowing the entire amount of credit even if part of the service is used for exempted goods. The adjudicating authority's denial of credit on the grounds that it was used for exempted electricity production was found incorrect since a substantial portion of electricity was used in manufacturing finished goods.

3. Proportional reversal of CENVAT Credit for electricity sold to third parties:

The Revenue's argument, based on the decision in Maruti Suzuki India Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III, was that electricity supplied to third parties for consideration should not entitle the assessee to full CENVAT credit. However, the Tribunal found that this decision pertained to 'inputs' and not 'input services', which receive special treatment under Rule 6(5) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as clarified by a CBEC circular.

4. Interpretation of 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:

The Tribunal upheld that 'input services' include services used in relation to business activities, not limited to the manufacture of final products. The High Court judgments in Ultratech Cement and Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. supported this broader interpretation. The Tribunal also referenced the decision in Union of India v. HEG Ltd, which allowed CENVAT credit for capital goods used in power plants, even when a major portion of electricity was sold. Similar logic applied to input services under Rule 6(5).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming that M/s DCW Ltd is entitled to full CENVAT credit for the services used in their cogeneration plant, including the portion of electricity sold to TNEB. The order of the appellate authority was upheld, and the appeal was found to be without merit.

---