Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital goods used in a captive power plant were ineligible for Cenvat credit on the ground that a major portion of the electricity generated was sold outside the factory, and whether Rule 6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 barred such credit.
Analysis: Rule 6(4) denies credit only where capital goods are used exclusively in the manufacture of exempted goods. The electricity generated in the captive power plant was not used solely for exempted clearance, because part of it was consumed within the factory for manufacture of the dutiable final product, sponge iron. On that factual footing, the capital goods could not be treated as exclusively used for exempted goods merely because surplus electricity was supplied outside.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in allowing Cenvat credit on the capital goods used in the captive power plant, and Rule 6(4) did not bar the credit.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit on capital goods is not barred under Rule 6(4) unless the goods are used exclusively for exempted goods; mixed use within the factory for manufacture of dutiable final products preserves eligibility.