TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court upholds bank's rights in pledge dispute, dismisses fraud claims.</h1> <h3>World Crest Advisors LLP Versus Catalyst Trusteeship Limited & Ors. And J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited</h3> World Crest Advisors LLP Versus Catalyst Trusteeship Limited & Ors. And J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Injunction against Yes Bank and JCF regarding voting rights and transfer of shares.2. Validity and enforceability of the Pledge Deeds.3. Allegations of fraud in the loan and pledge transactions.4. Rights of a Pledgee under the Indian Contract Act and other relevant laws.5. Transfer of shares from Yes Bank to JCF under the SARFAESI Act.Summary:1. Injunction against Yes Bank and JCF:The Plaintiff sought an injunction restraining Yes Bank and JCF from exercising voting rights and transferring the suit shares. The Court found that the Pledgee (Yes Bank/JCF) was entitled to exercise voting rights as per the Pledge Deeds and the Depositories Act, thus denying the injunction.2. Validity and Enforceability of the Pledge Deeds:The Court held that the Pledge Deeds, which included terms allowing the Pledgee to exercise voting rights, were valid and enforceable. The Pledgee's rights were not limited to those prescribed in Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act. The Court emphasized that the Contract Act is not exhaustive and parties can contractually agree upon additional terms unless they are in derogation of mandatory provisions.3. Allegations of Fraud:The Plaintiff alleged that the Pledge Deeds were vitiated by fraud, claiming that the loans were used for purposes other than those stated. The Court found that the alleged fraud, even if proven, would render the transaction voidable, not void. The Plaintiff had prior knowledge of the alleged fraud but did not avoid the Pledge Deeds, thus affirming them. The Court found no merit in the Plaintiff's claim that the Pledge Deeds were void under Sections 23 and 24 of the Contract Act.4. Rights of a Pledgee:The Court reiterated that a Pledgee has a 'special property' in the pledged goods, which allows the Pledgee to exercise rights such as voting. The Court referenced multiple precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in PTC India, to support the view that the Pledgee can exercise voting rights under the terms of the Pledge Deeds.5. Transfer of Shares from Yes Bank to JCF:The Court found that the transfer of shares from Yes Bank to JCF was lawful under the SARFAESI Act. The Assignment Agreement between Yes Bank and JCF was valid, and JCF, as the new Pledgee, was entitled to all rights, including voting rights, attached to the pledged shares.Conclusion:The Court dismissed the Plaintiff's Interim Application, upholding the rights of Yes Bank and JCF to exercise voting rights and transfer the pledged shares as per the Pledge Deeds and relevant laws. The allegations of fraud were found insufficient to render the Pledge Deeds void.
TaxTMI 