Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice seeking diversion of imported goods to the canalising agency could survive after the imported goods had already been cleared and disposed of, and whether any adjudication could still be completed.
Analysis: The proceeding was directed only at requiring the petitioner to hand over the imported goods to the canalising agency. Once the goods had been cleared pursuant to the earlier judicial order and were no longer available with the petitioner, no effective or fruitful adjudication could follow. The continuation of the enquiry would serve no useful purpose because the relief contemplated by the notice had become incapable of execution.
Conclusion: The show cause notice was quashed as having become redundant and incapable of further adjudication, in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the challenged show cause proceedings were set aside, with no order as to costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A show cause notice seeking a consequence that can no longer be worked out in law or in fact becomes liable to be quashed as infructuous when the subject goods are no longer available for adjudication or enforcement.