<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (6) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43609</link>
    <description>A show cause notice seeking diversion of imported goods to a canalising agency was quashed because the goods had already been cleared and were no longer with the petitioner. The court held that once the subject goods were unavailable, no effective or fruitful adjudication could continue, as the relief sought had become incapable of execution in law or fact. The enquiry was therefore redundant and infructuous, and the challenged proceedings were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (6) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43609</link>
      <description>A show cause notice seeking diversion of imported goods to a canalising agency was quashed because the goods had already been cleared and were no longer with the petitioner. The court held that once the subject goods were unavailable, no effective or fruitful adjudication could continue, as the relief sought had become incapable of execution in law or fact. The enquiry was therefore redundant and infructuous, and the challenged proceedings were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>