Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal, Remands Unexplained Expenditure Issue for Fresh Adjudication

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside transfer pricing adjustments for both the Thane and Nagda Plants. The issues concerning unexplained expenditure and undisclosed income were remanded for fresh adjudication due to the appellant providing additional evidence. The order was issued on 06.12.2022.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Transfer pricing adjustment of INR 54,62,391/- for export of finished goods from Thane Plant using Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM).
2. Transfer pricing adjustment of INR 50,80,855/- for export of finished goods from Nagda Plant using Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method.
3. Addition of INR 4,86,49,361/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act as unexplained expenditure.
4. Addition of INR 3,85,29,119/- as income from undisclosed sources.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

Ground No. 1: Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Thane Plant

The appellant contested the transfer pricing adjustment of INR 54,62,391/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) by adopting internal TNMM for exports from the Thane Plant. The appellant argued that the economic circumstances surrounding export sales and domestic sales differ materially, and thus, exports should be compared with exports alone. The appellant suggested that the internal TNMM method should compare the margins earned from exports to Associated Enterprises (AEs) with those earned from exports to non-AEs, as these transactions were in the same industry and had similar functional, asset, and risk (FAR) profiles.

The Departmental Representative countered by stating that the appellant failed to provide data specific to the geographical location of exports to AEs and third parties. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) rejected the appellant's objection, noting that internal comparability based on segments of sales to all AEs and all third parties would suffer from similar differences.

The Tribunal agreed with the appellant, noting that under TNMM, a broad similarity in FAR is acceptable. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the international transaction of export of goods from the Thane Plant by comparing the Operating Profit/Operating Cost (OP/OC) of export sales to non-AEs. Consequently, the transfer pricing adjustment of INR 54,62,391/- was set aside, and Ground No. 1 was allowed.

Ground No. 2: Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Nagda Plant

The appellant challenged the transfer pricing adjustment of INR 50,80,855/- made by adopting the CUP method for exports from the Nagda Plant. The appellant argued that the CUP method requires a high degree of comparability, which was not met due to significant differences in volume and geography between transactions with AEs and non-AEs. The appellant cited decisions from higher courts supporting the use of TNMM over CUP in cases with such differences.

The Departmental Representative argued that the CUP method provided the most reliable benchmark, given the internal comparable uncontrolled transactions. However, the Tribunal noted that in similar cases, TNMM was preferred due to the inability to eliminate or adjust differences in volume and geography under the CUP method. The Tribunal held that the CUP method could not be adopted as the most appropriate method and directed the AO to re-compute the ALP using internal TNMM. Consequently, the transfer pricing adjustment of INR 50,80,855/- was set aside, and Ground No. 2 was allowed.

Ground Nos. 3 to 5: Additions under Section 69C and Income from Undisclosed Sources

The appellant sought remand of the issues related to additions of INR 4,86,49,361/- and INR 3,85,29,119/-, arguing that additional evidence was now available to support their case. The appellant explained that they were unable to produce this evidence earlier due to time constraints and the unavailability of certain documents.

The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence, noting that the appellant had provided details for 18 out of 25 parties listed in the AO's notice. The Tribunal found the additional evidence relevant and accepted the appellant's reasons for the delay. The issues were remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication, considering the new evidence. Consequently, Ground Nos. 3 to 5 were disposed of with the direction for a fresh assessment.

Conclusion:

The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the transfer pricing adjustments for both the Thane and Nagda Plants and remanding the issues related to unexplained expenditure and undisclosed income for fresh adjudication. The order was pronounced on 06.12.2022.

---