Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The application arose from allegations concerning alleged forged documents, bogus invoices, and availment of input tax credit, but the record also showed that proceedings under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act were already underway. The Court noted the applicants' assertion of cooperation, the absence of a criminal antecedent, and considered the matter in the light of the principles governing anticipatory bail.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicants.