<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 432 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433917</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was granted under Section 438 CrPC to applicants accused of using forged documents, bogus invoices and wrongful input tax credit, as the Court considered their asserted cooperation, absence of criminal antecedents and the fact that proceedings under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act were already underway. Applying the governing principles for anticipatory bail, the Court found protection from arrest justified on the record before it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 432 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433917</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was granted under Section 438 CrPC to applicants accused of using forged documents, bogus invoices and wrongful input tax credit, as the Court considered their asserted cooperation, absence of criminal antecedents and the fact that proceedings under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act were already underway. Applying the governing principles for anticipatory bail, the Court found protection from arrest justified on the record before it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>