Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 1056 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Customs duty and penalties overturned for alleged violation of exemption notification The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the order dated 28.09.2012. It held that the customs authorities could not demand customs duty or impose ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Customs duty and penalties overturned for alleged violation of exemption notification

                          The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the order dated 28.09.2012. It held that the customs authorities could not demand customs duty or impose penalties based on the alleged violation of the exemption notification, as the DGCA had not found any such violations and had renewed the permits from time to time.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Confiscation of Aircrafts and Recovery of Import Duty
                          2. Jurisdiction of Customs Authorities
                          3. Usage of Imported Aircrafts for Non-Scheduled (Charter) Services
                          4. Violation of Conditions of Exemption Notification
                          5. Imposition of Penalty on the Director

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Confiscation of Aircrafts and Recovery of Import Duty:
                          The appellant, Chimes Aviation Pvt. Ltd., imported eleven CESSNA 172R Aircrafts for 'flying training' purposes under an exemption notification. The Commissioner of Central Excise confiscated eight of these aircrafts under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, but allowed them to be redeemed on payment of a redemption fine under Section 125. The Commissioner also ordered the recovery of import duty forgone on the aircrafts and spare parts, with interest, and imposed a penalty on the appellant for acts of omission and commission that rendered the aircrafts and spare parts liable to confiscation under Section 114 of the Customs Act.

                          2. Jurisdiction of Customs Authorities:
                          The appellant argued that the customs authorities did not have the jurisdiction to demand customs duty for the alleged violation of the exemption notification. They contended that only the competent authority under the DGCA could determine such violations. This argument was supported by the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in VRL Logistics Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad, which held that it is the jurisdictional authorities under the Civil Aviation Ministry that alone can monitor compliance with the conditions imposed and that the customs authorities can take action only when the DGCA finds a violation.

                          3. Usage of Imported Aircrafts for Non-Scheduled (Charter) Services:
                          The appellant had initially imported the aircrafts for flying training purposes and had given an undertaking to the customs authorities to this effect. However, due to financial constraints, they sought and obtained approval from the DGCA to use the aircrafts for non-scheduled (charter) services as well. The appellant claimed that the usage for charter services was minimal (1.21% of total flying hours) and that the main activity remained flying training. The show cause notice issued by the customs authorities alleged that this change in usage without informing the customs authorities violated the conditions of the exemption notification.

                          4. Violation of Conditions of Exemption Notification:
                          The customs authorities alleged that the appellant violated the conditions of the exemption notification by using the aircrafts for charter services without submitting a new undertaking to the customs authorities. The Tribunal, however, referred to the decision in VRL Logistics, which emphasized that only the DGCA could determine such violations. Since the DGCA had renewed the appellant's permits from time to time and had not found any violations, the Tribunal concluded that the customs authorities could not demand the customs duty based on the alleged violation.

                          5. Imposition of Penalty on the Director:
                          A separate appeal (Customs Appeal No. 55388 of 2013) was filed by the Director of the appellant, challenging the imposition of a penalty for acts of omission and commission. Since the Tribunal set aside the order on merits, it also concluded that no penalty could be imposed on the Director.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the order dated 28.09.2012. It held that the customs authorities could not demand customs duty or impose penalties based on the alleged violation of the exemption notification, as the DGCA had not found any such violations and had renewed the permits from time to time.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found