<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the order dated 28.09.2012. It held that the customs authorities could not demand customs duty or impose penalties based on the alleged violation of the exemption notification, as the DGCA had not found any such violations and had renewed the permits from time to time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the order dated 28.09.2012. It held that the customs authorities could not demand customs duty or impose penalties based on the alleged violation of the exemption notification, as the DGCA had not found any such violations and had renewed the permits from time to time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>