Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed refund under Section 54 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969, and whether the refund arising from the appellate order was covered by the principle of merger.
Analysis: The refund became payable only after the appellate relief, but the appellate order merely corrected the assessment and the assessment stood merged in the appellate determination. On that footing, the refund claim was treated as arising from the order of assessment for the purpose of Section 54. The Court followed its earlier decisions recognising that a dealer who is ultimately found entitled to refund cannot be denied statutory interest merely because the assessment was carried in appeal. Reference was also made to the comparable interest provision under Section 38 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, which supports the entitlement to interest on delayed refund.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed refund at 6% per annum from 13.07.2009 until actual payment.