Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made for soft-skill and general training services to a Singapore entity constituted fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA and section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so as to require deduction of tax at source and attract liability as assessee in default under section 201.
Analysis: The services were for leadership, communication, teamwork and similar general training for employees. The training improved skills but did not involve transfer of technology or transmission of technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes that enabled the recipient to apply the technology independently. The make available condition in Article 12 of the DTAA was therefore not satisfied. Since the payment was not chargeable to tax in India on these facts, the obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195 did not arise, and the consequential demand under section 201 could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The payment was not taxable as fees for technical services and the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default for non-deduction of tax at source.