Court Denies Interim Bail on Medical Grounds under PMLA Act

The court dismissed the petitioner's application for interim bail on medical grounds under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). The court found the petitioner's medical condition stable, with adequate treatment provided by jail authorities. Emphasizing the need to establish inadequacy in medical treatment for granting interim bail, the court noted the prompt response to the petitioner's medical incident by jail authorities and medical professionals. No grounds were found justifying the need for interim bail based on medical reports, leading to the dismissal of the application. The court directed obtaining a neurological evaluation from a specific hospital for consideration during the regular bail application hearing.

---

---

Issues:
Interim bail application due to medical grounds under PMLA.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner moved an application for interim bail on medical grounds during the pendency of a regular bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
2. The petitioner's counsel argued that due to the petitioner's medical condition, urgent interim bail was necessary for eight weeks to consult his previous doctor for neurological illnesses.
3. The respondent contended that the medical condition of the petitioner was stable, and there was no inadequacy in the treatment provided by the jail authorities, citing various legal judgments.
4. The court considered the medical report, previous judgments, and the nature of offenses under PMLA while evaluating the interim bail application.
5. Referring to a Supreme Court case, the court emphasized the need to establish inadequacy in medical treatment to grant interim bail on medical grounds.
6. The court noted the medical history of the petitioner, the treatment provided in jail, and the stable condition reported in the medical report.
7. It was observed that the incident on 14th July, 2022, was promptly addressed by jail authorities and medical professionals, with ongoing treatment and recommendations for further evaluation.
8. The court found no grounds justifying the need for interim bail based on the medical reports and treatment provided, ultimately dismissing the application.
9. A direction was given to obtain neurological evaluation from a specific hospital and present it for consideration during the hearing of the regular bail application.

This detailed analysis covers the arguments presented by both parties, the legal principles applied by the court, and the specific medical details considered in the judgment.

---