Bail in state security cases requires caution where a prima facie case exists and evidence cannot be assessed prematurely.

In serious non-bailable offences involving the Official Secrets Act and criminal conspiracy, bail should not be granted on a premature appraisal of the evidence. The court must consider the gravity of the allegations, the prima facie case, the character of the evidence, the risk of absconding or witness tampering, and the larger public or State interest. On the material available, the prosecution case could not be rejected at the threshold and the High Court's view that the evidence was insufficient for conviction was premature. The bail order was therefore set aside, the accused was to remain in judicial custody until further orders, and the trial court was to proceed independently of the High Court's observations.

---

---

Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in granting bail to an charged with offences under the Official Secrets Act and criminal conspiracy, having regard to the gravity of the allegations and the security of the State.

Analysis: In considering bail in serious non-bailable offences, especially where the trial has not commenced, relevant factors include the nature and seriousness of the offence, the character of the evidence, the accused's circumstances, the possibility of securing attendance at trial, apprehension of tampering with witnesses, and the larger interests of the public or the State. On the material available, the prosecution case could not be dismissed at the threshold and a prima facie case was disclosed. The allegations concerned disclosure of defence-related information and matters affecting national security, and the High Court's assessment of the evidence as insufficient for conviction was held to be premature.

Conclusion: The grant of bail was not justified and the order enlarging the respondent on bail was liable to be set aside.

Final Conclusion: The respondent was directed to remain in judicial custody until further orders, and the trial court was to proceed independently of the High Court's observations.

Ratio Decidendi: In serious non-bailable offences affecting the security of the State, bail should not be granted on a premature appraisal of the evidence, and the court must weigh the gravity of the offence, the prima facie case, and the larger public interest.

---