Medical bail denied where reports showed stability, improvement on medication, and no need for neurological intervention.

Medical bail was declined because successive medical reports, including the Medical Board opinion and discharge summary, showed stability, improvement on medication, and no need for neurological or neurosurgical intervention. The court treated the earlier rejection of bail, the opinion that the accused was fit to face trial, and the constant monitoring with specialised treatment in appropriate medical institutions as material circumstances. On that record, continued deterioration was not established and bail on medical grounds was not justified; the application was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the accused, in the facts of the case and on the basis of the medical materials on record, was entitled to bail on medical grounds.

Analysis: The accused's claim of continued deterioration was tested against successive medical reports, including the opinion of the Medical Board and the discharge summary, which recorded stability, improvement on medication, and absence of any need for neurological or neurosurgical intervention. The earlier rejection of bail and the medical opinion that the accused was fit to face trial were relevant circumstances. The Court also noted that the authorities had kept the accused under constant monitoring and had provided specialised treatment in appropriate medical institutions.

Conclusion: Bail on medical grounds was not justified on the record and the application was rejected.

---