Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2022 (9) TMI 948 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Rules in Favor of Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case The Tribunal admitted the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Rules in Favor of Financial Creditor in Insolvency Case

                            The Tribunal admitted the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor. A moratorium was declared, an Interim Resolution Professional appointed, and the Financial Creditor instructed to deposit funds for expenses. The acknowledgment of debt within the limitation period was deemed valid, providing a fresh period of limitation and making the petition timely. Multiple proceedings under the SARFAESI Act did not bar the current insolvency proceedings. The Tribunal focused on the default in repayment and acknowledgment of debt, ultimately ruling in favor of the Financial Creditor.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Default in repayment by the Corporate Debtor.
                            2. Barred by limitation.
                            3. Multiple proceedings under SARFAESI Act, 2002.
                            4. Reconciliation and adjustment of amounts already paid.
                            5. Acknowledgment of debt and its impact on the limitation period.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            Default in repayment by the Corporate Debtor:
                            The Financial Creditor, UCO Bank, initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor defaulted on a sum of Rs.9,56,64,393.25 as of 30 December, 2020. The Financial Creditor had provided several credit facilities, including term loans and cash credit limits, which were renewed and enhanced multiple times. Despite these accommodations, the Corporate Debtor failed to make timely repayments, leading to the account being classified as Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 28 February, 2018.

                            Barred by limitation:
                            The Corporate Debtor contended that the application was barred by limitation. However, the Tribunal noted that the acknowledgment of debt within the limitation period would give rise to a fresh period of limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Tribunal referred to a letter dated 17 November, 2020, which was considered an acknowledgment of debt, thus attracting section 18 and providing a fresh limitation period.

                            Multiple proceedings under SARFAESI Act, 2002:
                            The Corporate Debtor argued that the Financial Creditor had already initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and issued a possession notice, thus should not be allowed to file the instant application. The Tribunal, however, did not find this argument sufficient to bar the current proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

                            Reconciliation and adjustment of amounts already paid:
                            The Corporate Debtor claimed that the account needed reconciliation and adjustment for amounts already paid, including the sale proceeds of mortgaged property amounting to Rs.1,20,63,000/-. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail but focused on the overall default and acknowledgment of debt.

                            Acknowledgment of debt and its impact on the limitation period:
                            The Tribunal relied on the acknowledgment of debt through the pending restructuring proposal and the One-Time Settlement (OTS) proposal dated 17 November, 2020. Citing the judgment in Tejas Khandhar v Bank of Baroda, the Tribunal held that an OTS proposal falls within the definition of 'acknowledgment of debt' under section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. This acknowledgment provided a fresh period of limitation, thus making the petition filed by the Financial Creditor timely.

                            Order:
                            The Tribunal admitted the application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. A moratorium under section 14 of the Code was declared, and Mr. Madhur Agarwal was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IRP was directed to carry out functions as per the Code, and the Financial Creditor was instructed to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- for expenses related to public notice and inviting claims. The Tribunal also directed the communication of the order to relevant parties and scheduled a progress report filing on 02.11.2022.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found