Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether late fee under section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied through intimation under section 200A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for TDS statements furnished before 01.06.2015.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that section 234E is the charging provision creating liability for fee for delayed furnishing of TDS statements, while section 200A is only a machinery provision regulating processing and computation. It followed the jurisdictional High Court's view that the amendment to section 200A enabling computation of fee under section 234E is clarificatory in nature and does not make the levy dependent on the amendment date. The Tribunal also noted that, in the hierarchy of precedents, the jurisdictional High Court's ruling binds it and therefore the contrary view of another High Court could not be preferred.
Conclusion: The levy of fee under section 234E for statements filed before 01.06.2015 was upheld and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Liability to fee under section 234E exists independently of the processing mechanism in section 200A, and the amendment to section 200A does not postpone or nullify the levy for pre-01.06.2015 defaults.