Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court should interfere at the stage of a show cause notice and whether the petitioner was entitled to supply of particulars before filing objections.
Analysis: The dispute concerned alleged short-levy of central excise duty in relation to erection and installation of haulages and conveyors. The Court declined to decide the factual controversy on whether the activity amounted to manufacture of goods or the limitation objection, holding that such questions were for the statutory authority. At the same time, the petitioner's grievance that the demand particulars had not been supplied was accepted, as the petitioner had been handicapped in preparing its defence without those particulars.
Conclusion: The Court did not interfere with the merits of the show cause proceeding, but directed the respondents to supply the particulars used to compute the claim and allowed the petitioner to file objections thereafter.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of with limited procedural relief to the petitioner, while all substantive issues were left open for decision by the statutory authority.
Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings at the show cause stage, the Court will ordinarily not adjudicate disputed questions of fact or limitation, but may require disclosure of the basis of the demand to enable an effective statutory defence.