<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42382</link>
    <description>In a show cause stage challenge to alleged central excise short-levy on erection and installation of haulages and conveyors, the HC declined to decide disputed questions of manufacture or limitation, leaving those issues to the statutory authority. However, it held that the noticee was handicapped in preparing objections because the basis of the demand had not been disclosed. The Court therefore refused to interfere with the merits of the proceeding, but directed supply of the particulars used to compute the claim and permitted the petitioner to file objections thereafter. Substantive issues remained open for determination by the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42382</link>
      <description>In a show cause stage challenge to alleged central excise short-levy on erection and installation of haulages and conveyors, the HC declined to decide disputed questions of manufacture or limitation, leaving those issues to the statutory authority. However, it held that the noticee was handicapped in preparing objections because the basis of the demand had not been disclosed. The Court therefore refused to interfere with the merits of the proceeding, but directed supply of the particulars used to compute the claim and permitted the petitioner to file objections thereafter. Substantive issues remained open for determination by the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>