TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant, in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The application was considered on the footing that the applicant's role was at the highest that of an abettor and that the principal allegations concerned fake input tax credit and the operation of dummy firms by others. It was also noted that the material did not disclose any likelihood of tampering with evidence if the applicant was enlarged on bail.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the accused is shown, at least at the bail stage, to have a limited role as an alleged abettor and no credible risk of tampering with evidence is demonstrated, bail may be allowed subject to conditions.
TaxTMI 
