<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 355 - CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423514</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the CGST Act where the applicant was treated, at the bail stage, as having at most an abettor&#039;s role in alleged fake input tax credit and dummy firm operations by others. The court found no credible material showing a likelihood of tampering with evidence if released. On that basis, the applicant was enlarged on bail, subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=681415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 355 - CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423514</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a prosecution under the CGST Act where the applicant was treated, at the bail stage, as having at most an abettor&#039;s role in alleged fake input tax credit and dummy firm operations by others. The court found no credible material showing a likelihood of tampering with evidence if released. On that basis, the applicant was enlarged on bail, subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>