2022 (6) TMI 355

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n for applicant. SPP Pathak for respondent No.1 APP Abhijeet Gondwal for respondent No.2 ORDER 1. This is an application U/s.439 of Code of Criminal Procedure(hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.) for the grant of bail to the applicant Sachin Kankrai Mehta in File No.GEXCOM/AE/FU/672/2021-AE-O/0 COMMR. CGST-BWD-NS PHARMA registered with the respondent No.1 for the offence U/s.132 of Central Goo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 3. Learned Adv.Jain for the applicant argued that applicant after receipt of the summons appeared before the respondent on 09/03/2022. Applicant has specifically stated to the respondent that Mr.Naitik Mewani approached him for opening of those firms in the name of the applicant. Relying on his words, applicant has provided his basic details like PAN Card, ADHAAR Card, mobile number and accordin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l before the Supreme Court, stand taken by the respondent is that Paresh Mewani and Naitik Mewani are looking 17 firms run by different persons. However, activities of those firms are carried out by them. And they have committed offence under CGST Act and availed more than Rs.300 Crores as fake ITC. Those 17 firms include these two firms. Those pleadings were taken by the respondent on the basis o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the commission of the offence. Offence is serious in nature. Investigation is still in progress. Therefore, application requires to be rejected. 5. After hearing both the sides, I have gone through record. As per say of the respondent, in the matters of Mewani, stand taken by the respondent is that those Mewani were running 17 fake firms and availed ITC and committed offence. Stand taken by the....