Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 is cognizable and non-bailable, and consequently whether the FIR and the criminal proceedings could be quashed on the footing that the offence was non-cognizable.
Analysis: Section 63 prescribes imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to three years, along with fine. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, offences punishable with imprisonment for three years and upwards but not more than seven years are cognizable and non-bailable, while offences punishable with imprisonment for less than three years or with fine only are non-cognizable. The maximum punishment under Section 63 being three years brings the offence within the cognizable category. The contrary view based on the cited precedent was held inapplicable to the statutory language governing classification of offences.
Conclusion: The offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 is cognizable and non-bailable, and the High Court's contrary view was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of offence classification under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, an offence punishable with imprisonment extending to three years falls within the cognizable and non-bailable category under Part II of the First Schedule.