Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bail restrictions in Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 apply to an offence punishable under Section 20(b)(i) of that Act for possession of ganja.
Analysis: Section 37 begins with a non-obstante clause and places additional limitations on the grant of bail beyond the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Its operation is attracted where the accused is charged with an offence punishable with imprisonment of five years or more under the Act, and bail can be granted only if the prosecution is heard and the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The punishment under Section 20(b)(i) extends up to five years, and there is no basis to exclude such an offence from the sweep of Section 37. The scheme of the Act and its legislative object of curbing illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs also support a stringent construction of the bail provision.
Conclusion: Section 37 applies to an offence under Section 20(b)(i) of the Act, and the High Court was wrong in granting bail without satisfying the statutory conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: For offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 punishable with imprisonment of five years or more, the special bail restrictions in Section 37 apply notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and bail cannot be granted unless the statutory twin conditions are satisfied.