Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was complete and maintainable, whether default stood established and no pre-existing dispute existed, and whether the corporate insolvency resolution process should be admitted with consequential moratorium and appointment of an interim resolution professional.
Analysis: The operational creditor produced invoices, demand notices, affidavit compliance, and account material to show an unpaid operational debt. The corporate debtor's own reply indicated that the principal amount remained payable, while the asserted dispute regarding reprocessing and alleged set-off was not accepted as a bar to admission. The application was found to satisfy the statutory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the outstanding amount crossed the applicable threshold. The absence of any qualifying pre-existing dispute and the presence of default brought the case within the scope of Section 9.
Conclusion: The application under Section 9 was held maintainable and was admitted, with moratorium declared and an interim resolution professional appointed.