<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1303 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421637</link>
    <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found complete and maintainable because the operational creditor supported the claim with invoices, demand notices, affidavit compliance and account material showing an unpaid operational debt. The corporate debtor&#039;s reply itself indicated that the principal amount remained payable, and the asserted dispute over reprocessing and alleged set-off was not treated as a qualifying pre-existing dispute. Default was therefore established, the statutory threshold was met, and the application was admitted with moratorium declared and an interim resolution professional appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=677468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1303 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , ALLAHABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421637</link>
      <description>An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found complete and maintainable because the operational creditor supported the claim with invoices, demand notices, affidavit compliance and account material showing an unpaid operational debt. The corporate debtor&#039;s reply itself indicated that the principal amount remained payable, and the asserted dispute over reprocessing and alleged set-off was not treated as a qualifying pre-existing dispute. Default was therefore established, the statutory threshold was met, and the application was admitted with moratorium declared and an interim resolution professional appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=421637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>