Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice and assessment order were liable to be quashed for failure to grant the mandatory 30 days' period before proceeding under the GST law.
Analysis: The petitioner was directed to reply within a period shorter than the minimum statutory period of 30 days. The order was passed ex parte before expiry of the period required by the statute. Compliance with the prescribed notice period is mandatory, and denial of that opportunity vitiates the proceedings.
Conclusion: The notice and the assessment order were quashed and the matter was remitted to the assessing officer to issue a fresh notice and pass an order in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded on the ground of denial of the statutory opportunity, and the assessment proceedings were set aside for fresh adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute prescribes a minimum notice period before assessment, proceeding ex parte before expiry of that period violates the mandatory requirement and cannot be sustained.