<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 172 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415406</link>
    <description>The Patna HC held that where GST law prescribes a mandatory minimum 30-day period to reply, an assessment made ex parte before expiry of that period is procedurally invalid. Denial of the statutory opportunity to respond vitiates the notice and the assessment order, and such proceedings cannot be sustained. The notice and assessment order were quashed, and the matter was remitted to the assessing officer for fresh notice and fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2021 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 172 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415406</link>
      <description>The Patna HC held that where GST law prescribes a mandatory minimum 30-day period to reply, an assessment made ex parte before expiry of that period is procedurally invalid. Denial of the statutory opportunity to respond vitiates the notice and the assessment order, and such proceedings cannot be sustained. The notice and assessment order were quashed, and the matter was remitted to the assessing officer for fresh notice and fresh adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=415406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>