Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice issued under the GST law and the consequential proceedings were liable to be quashed for non-compliance with the mandatory statutory period before passing the assessment order.
Analysis: The Court noted that the petitioner was not afforded the minimum statutory period required before the assessing officer proceeded ex parte. Relying on its earlier decision on the same legal issue, the Court held that the notice and the consequent proceedings could not be sustained where the mandatory period was curtailed. The Court therefore directed that a fresh notice be issued in accordance with the statutory provisions and that the matter be decided afresh after giving due opportunity to the petitioner.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded and the impugned notice and connected proceedings were quashed, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory notice period prescribed before ex parte adjudication under the GST law is mandatory, and breach of that requirement vitiates the notice and the resultant assessment.