Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (9) TMI 182 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal sets aside addition for verification & deletes late deposit disallowance The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the addition of Rs. 8,20,480 for further verification and deleting the disallowance of Rs. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal sets aside addition for verification & deletes late deposit disallowance

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the addition of Rs. 8,20,480 for further verification and deleting the disallowance of Rs. 1,16,779 for the late deposit of employees' contributions to PF and ESI.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 8,20,480 based on TDS amounts appearing in Form 26AS.
                          2. Disallowance of Rs. 1,16,779 for late deposit of employees' share towards Provident Fund (PF) and Employees' State Insurance (ESI).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 8,20,480 based on TDS amounts appearing in Form 26AS:

                          The Revenue challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] confirming the addition of Rs. 8,20,480 due to discrepancies between the assessee's accounts and the TDS amounts recorded in Form 26AS. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee did not declare an income of Rs. 8,20,480 from Tata Consulting Engineers Ltd. (TCE) as reflected in Form 26AS. The assessee contended that this amount did not pertain to any bill issued by them and was wrongly shown in their account. Despite this, the CIT(A) upheld the AO's addition, citing the assessee's failure to reconcile the discrepancy.

                          Before the Tribunal, the assessee argued that they had repeatedly communicated with TCE to rectify the error, but TCE did not amend the TDS statement. The assessee claimed that it was beyond their control to correct the mistake in Form 26AS, and the responsibility lay with TCE. The Revenue countered that the onus was on the assessee to reconcile the difference and produce confirmation from TCE.

                          The Tribunal observed that the AO made the addition based on the presumption that the amount shown in Form 26AS was the actual gross receipt without verifying the facts. The CIT(A) confirmed the addition on the ground that the assessee failed to reconcile the difference. The Tribunal noted that proper verification by the AO was necessary once the assessee disputed the amount. The Tribunal set aside this issue to the AO for proper enquiry, instructing the AO to obtain necessary information from TCE and decide the issue after giving the assessee an opportunity for a hearing.

                          2. Disallowance of Rs. 1,16,779 for late deposit of employees' share towards PF and ESI:

                          The AO disallowed Rs. 1,70,120 for the late deposit of employees' contributions to PF and ESI, despite the amounts being deposited before the due date of filing the tax return under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act. The AO relied on CBDT Circular No.22/2015 and Sections 36(1)(va) and 2(24)(x) of the Income Tax Act, asserting that the contributions must be deposited by the due date specified in the respective statutes.

                          The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The assessee argued that higher courts, including the Supreme Court, have allowed deductions for employee contributions to PF and ESI if paid before the due date of filing the return. The Revenue contended that the amendment by the Finance Act, 2015, restricted the applicability of Section 43B to employer contributions only, not to employee contributions.

                          The Tribunal referred to the binding precedents, including the decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in CIT vs. Aimil Ltd. (2009) 321 ITR 508 (Delhi), which held that employee contributions paid before the due date of filing the return are allowable under Section 43B. The Tribunal acknowledged the amendment by the Finance Act, 2021, clarifying that Section 43B does not apply to employee contributions, but noted that this amendment is applicable from Assessment Year 2021-22 onwards.

                          The Tribunal concluded that for the assessment year under consideration, the employee contributions paid before the due date of filing the return are allowable deductions. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs. 1,16,779 made by the AO.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal setting aside the addition of Rs. 8,20,480 for further verification and deleting the disallowance of Rs. 1,16,779 for the late deposit of employees' contributions to PF and ESI.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found