Corporate Debtor Ordered for Liquidation Under Insolvency Code: Resolution Professional Appointed as Liquidator

The Tribunal disposed of IA No. 949/2020, ordering the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Resolution Professional was appointed as the Liquidator, with directions on legal proceedings, stakeholder cooperation, and compliance with regulatory requirements. The decision highlighted the necessity for liquidation due to the rejection of the sole resolution plan and the absence of alternative proposals within the specified period, emphasizing adherence to procedural and regulatory obligations throughout the liquidation process.

---

---

Issues:
1. Liquidation order under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Analysis:
The case involved IA No. 949/2020 filed by the Resolution Professional of a Corporate Debtor seeking a liquidation order under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor, and despite efforts to solicit resolution plans, only one plan was received, which was ultimately rejected by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) during the voting process. As no alternative resolution plan was forthcoming within the specified time frame, the Resolution Professional sought a liquidation order.

The Tribunal referred to the provisions of Section 33(1)(a) of the Code, which mandates passing an order of liquidation if no resolution plan is received within the stipulated period or if the submitted plan is rejected for non-compliance. The Tribunal noted the timeline of the case, considering extensions granted due to the COVID-19 lockdown period, and determined that the application for liquidation was filed within the permissible time frame.

Regarding the appointment of a Liquidator, the Tribunal appointed the Resolution Professional as the Liquidator after verifying the necessary consents and credentials. The Tribunal also highlighted the relevant regulations under the CIRP Regulations, 2016, such as Regulation 39B, 39C, and 39D, addressing liquidation costs, sale of assets as a going concern, and fees of the Liquidator, respectively.

Furthermore, the Tribunal directed the Liquidator to take actions related to pending applications, including seeking cooperation from Directors and assistance from local administration. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with various provisions and regulations governing the liquidation process, ensuring that all stakeholders are duly informed and involved in the proceedings.

In conclusion, the Tribunal disposed of IA No. 949/2020, ordering the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal issued specific directions concerning legal proceedings, transfer of powers to the Liquidator, stakeholder cooperation, and the publication of public announcements as required by the regulations.

The detailed analysis of the judgment reflects a comprehensive review of the case, considering legal provisions, timelines, regulatory requirements, and the specific circumstances leading to the liquidation order under Section 33(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

---