Tribunal Admits Operational Creditor's Petition for Insolvency

The Tribunal admitted the operational creditor's petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, finding the operational debt due and payable by the corporate debtor. As the respondent did not dispute the debt or make payments, the Tribunal declared a default in payment, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional, Mr. Nandish Sunilbhai Vin. A moratorium was declared under Section 13 of the Code to protect the corporate debtor from legal actions during the insolvency resolution process. The Tribunal's decision aimed at ensuring compliance with the Code for an effective resolution of the insolvency matter.

---

---

Issues:
1. Application under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for operational debt.
2. Default in payment of operational debt by the corporate debtor.
3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional.
4. Declaration of moratorium under Section 13 of the Code.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Application under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for operational debt
The operational creditor, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and supply of goods, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming that the respondent owed a total sum towards the supply of goods. The applicant provided various documents to support the claim, including unpaid tax invoices, ledger entries, GST returns, and a demand notice issued under Section 8 of the Code. The Tribunal found that the applicant's petition was well within the limitation period, and there was no denial of the operational debt by the corporate debtor. The Tribunal concluded that the operational debt was due and payable, meeting the requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Issue 2: Default in payment of operational debt by the corporate debtor
The Tribunal noted that the respondent had not filed a reply despite multiple opportunities and that the demand notice had been served upon the corporate debtor. The documents presented by the operational creditor established the existence of the debt and the default in payment by the corporate debtor. Referring to a previous Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal determined that the operational debt was due, no dispute had been raised by the respondent, and the amount claimed was payable by the corporate debtor. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the corporate debtor had committed a default in payment of operational debt, warranting the initiation of the insolvency resolution process.

Issue 3: Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional
The Tribunal directed the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional to oversee the insolvency resolution process. Mr. Nandish Sunilbhai Vin was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional to act in accordance with Section 13(1)(c) of the Code. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Code and ensuring the proper management of the insolvency resolution process.

Issue 4: Declaration of moratorium under Section 13 of the Code
In line with Section 13 of the Code, the Tribunal declared a moratorium to prohibit various actions against the corporate debtor, including the institution of suits, transfer of assets, and recovery of property. The moratorium was to remain in effect until the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process or any subsequent orders passed by the Tribunal. Additionally, the Tribunal specified that essential services to the corporate debtor should not be terminated during the moratorium period, except for transactions notified by the Central Government in consultation with financial sector regulators.

In conclusion, the Tribunal admitted the petition, declared a moratorium, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, and directed communication of the order to relevant parties, ensuring compliance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for the effective resolution of the insolvency process.

---