Adjudicating Authority admits Section 9 petition under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Debt due, moratorium declared.

The Adjudicating Authority admitted the petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by an operational creditor against a corporate debtor. The operational debt was established with supporting documentation, and the corporate debtor did not contest the matter. The Adjudicating Authority found the debt due and payable, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional to manage the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The judgment emphasized compliance with documentation requirements, absence of pre-existing dispute, and the initiation of resolution proceedings to address the default in payment by the corporate debtor.

---

---

Issues:
- Admission of petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
- Determination of operational debt and default by the corporate debtor.
- Compliance with documentation requirements and absence of pre-existing dispute.
- Declaration of moratorium and appointment of Interim Resolution Professional.

Analysis:
1. Admission of Petition: The petition was filed under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by an operational creditor against a corporate debtor. The operational creditor provided detailed information regarding the debt originating from the purchase of machinery, along with supporting documentation such as demand notice, purchase order, sales contract, financial conditions, bills of exchange, and invoices.

2. Operational Debt and Default: The corporate debtor admitted the debt and did not contest the matter during the hearing. The chain of events clearly established the operational creditor's status. The Adjudicating Authority found that the operational debt was due and payable, with no pre-existing dispute from the corporate debtor's side. Sufficient evidence was presented to establish the default in payment by the corporate debtor.

3. Compliance and Dispute Resolution: The application met the necessary requirements, and the Adjudicating Authority confirmed that the operational debt was within the limitation period. The documents provided by the operational creditor proved the existence of the debt and the default on the part of the corporate debtor. The judgment referenced a Supreme Court case to emphasize the conditions for admitting such applications and highlighted the lack of dispute raised by the respondent.

4. Moratorium and Resolution Process: The Adjudicating Authority directed the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, declaring a moratorium as per Section 13 of the Code. The appointed Interim Resolution Professional was tasked with making a public announcement and managing the resolution process. The moratorium was to remain in effect until the completion of the resolution process or liquidation, with specific restrictions on legal actions against the corporate debtor and asset transactions.

5. Appointment and Communication: The Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and communication of the order was directed to the relevant parties. Additionally, the Registry was instructed to notify the Registrar of Companies about the corporate insolvency resolution process to prevent any actions that could hinder the resolution or asset realization for stakeholders.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal aspects, findings, and directives issued by the Adjudicating Authority in response to the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

---