Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants, arrested in a CGST prosecution, were entitled to be released on bail.
Analysis: Bail was considered on the settled principles governing judicial discretion, namely the nature of the accusation, the supporting material, the length of custody, the need for further custodial interrogation, the risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, and the likelihood of absconding. The Court also took note that the departmental complaint or charge-sheet had not been shown to be ready within the statutory period, that the main accused had already been granted bail, and that the applicants had remained in custody for a substantial period. Reliance was placed on the governing principles laid down for bail decisions and on a similar bail order in a comparable CGST matter.
Conclusion: The applicants were held entitled to bail and were admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds and sureties subject to standard conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Bail in a serious economic offence may be granted where custody is no longer shown to be necessary, the investigation does not indicate immediate filing of the complaint, and the usual risks of flight or tampering do not outweigh the circumstances favouring release.