NCLT admits insolvency plea by Natraj Proteins against Claro Energy for payment issues

The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, entertained an application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by Natraj Proteins Limited against Claro Energy Private Limited for irregular payment issues. The Tribunal established jurisdiction based on the debtor's registered office location, found the application timely filed, appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional, and imposed a moratorium post-admission. Mr. Rajesh Lohia was named Interim Resolution Professional, and operational creditors were directed to deposit funds for expenses. The moratorium under Section 14(1) of the Code was implemented with specified conditions for compliance.

---

---

Issues:
Application under section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency process against a private limited company. Dispute over outstanding payment for supply of Solar Photovoltaic Pump Sets. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain the application. Time bar for filing the application. Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional. Moratorium following the admission of the application.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Application under section 9 of IBC, 2016:
The application was filed by Natraj Proteins Limited against Claro Energy Private Limited for initiating the Corporate Insolvency process due to irregular payment issues. The applicant alleged non-payment of a significant amount by the corporate debtor despite various assurances and demands.

2. Dispute over outstanding payment:
The corporate debtor disputed the outstanding amount, claiming over-invoicing and non-receipt of payments from the end customer. The applicant denied the allegations and provided evidence of the debt, including demand notices and communication records.

3. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal:
The Tribunal established its jurisdiction to entertain the application based on the location of the corporate debtor's registered office in Delhi. This jurisdictional aspect was crucial for the Tribunal to proceed with the case.

4. Time bar for filing the application:
The Tribunal determined that the application was filed within the period of limitation, as the date of default occurred on 17.08.2018, and the application was submitted on 18.10.2019, ensuring it was not time-barred.

5. Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional:
The Tribunal named Mr. Rajesh Lohia as the Interim Resolution Professional, subject to certain conditions and disclosures. The Operational Creditors were directed to deposit a sum with the IRP to meet expenses related to the insolvency resolution process.

6. Moratorium following admission of the application:
Upon admission of the application, a moratorium was imposed on the corporate debtor as per the provisions of Section 14(1) of the Code, prohibiting certain actions during this period. The specific terms and conditions of the moratorium were outlined for compliance by the parties involved.

This detailed analysis covers the key issues addressed in the legal judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, regarding the application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the subsequent actions and decisions taken by the Tribunal in response to the dispute between the parties involved.

---