Electoral funding safeguards justified refusal of an interim stay on the Electoral Bond Scheme

An interim stay on the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018 was found unwarranted because the Scheme contained banking-channel safeguards, KYC compliance, eligibility limits, non-tradability, and disclosure-linked financial record requirements that materially reduced the risk of complete anonymity or misuse. The Court also noted the existing interim arrangement requiring disclosure of donor particulars to the Election Commission. On that basis, the apprehension raised at the interim stage was insufficient to halt the Scheme, and the request for stay was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether an interim stay of the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018 was justified.

Analysis: The challenge was examined in the context of the Scheme's stated object, the safeguards built into it, and the earlier interim arrangement already directing disclosure of donor particulars to the Election Commission. The Court noted that the Scheme operated through banking channels, required KYC compliance, restricted purchase to eligible persons, made the bonds non-tradable, and linked political party receipts and corporate expenditure to audited and filed financial records. On that basis, the apprehension of complete anonymity or misuse was not found sufficient to justify stopping the scheme at that stage, especially when the bonds had already been issued periodically and an interim safeguard was in place.

Conclusion: Interim stay was not warranted and the request for stay was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: A scheme for electoral funding will not be stayed at an interim stage when it contains banking-channel safeguards, KYC restrictions, and disclosure mechanisms that materially reduce the alleged risk of complete anonymity or misuse.

---