Appeal granted: Interest on receivables, no netting allowed.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to charge interest on outstanding receivables at LIBOR + 200 basis points, allow a credit period of 120 days, and reject netting payables against receivables due to insufficient details. The decision emphasized that receivables constitute a separate international transaction and interest must be imputed if receivables are realized beyond the agreed period, aligning with the amendment to Explanation to Section 92B.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Charging of interest on outstanding receivables.
2. Determination of applicable interest rate.
3. Allowance of credit period.
4. Netting of outstanding payables against receivables.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Charging of Interest on Outstanding Receivables:
The core issue in the appeal is the charging of interest on outstanding receivables. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) identified outstanding receivables of Rs. 59,17,71,560/- and proposed to charge notional interest at 14.5%, based on SBI deposit rates. The assessee contended that these receivables were related to international transactions and not in the nature of advances or loans. The TPO, referencing clause 'c' to Explanation to Section 92B, which includes receivables as international transactions, rejected the assessee's objections and suggested an adjustment of Rs. 6,54,11,154/-. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld this adjustment, directing the Assessing Officer (AO) to charge interest till the end of the financial year. The assessee's appeal to the Tribunal argued that the interest on receivables should be subsumed in working capital adjustments and that no separate adjustment was necessary.

2. Determination of Applicable Interest Rate:
The assessee alternatively argued that if interest were to be imputed, it should be based on LIBOR rates instead of SBI rates, given the receivables were in foreign exchange. The Tribunal noted that the TPO had used SBI Fixed Deposit rates, but in cases involving foreign exchange receivables, the LIBOR + 200 basis points rate should be applied. This was consistent with previous Tribunal decisions in similar cases.

3. Allowance of Credit Period:
The TPO allowed a credit period of 30 days, which the assessee contested, requesting a 120-day credit period. The Tribunal, considering precedents and the specifics of the case, directed the AO/TPO to allow a 120-day credit period and charge interest only for delays beyond this period. This decision was influenced by similar rulings in the cases of M/s. Value Labs Technologies and Infor (India) Pvt. Ltd.

4. Netting of Outstanding Payables Against Receivables:
The assessee argued for netting off outstanding payables of Rs. 13,08,87,984/- against receivables. The DRP rejected this due to the lack of detailed information from the assessee. The Tribunal upheld this rejection, noting the absence of details even during the appeal.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to:
- Charge interest on outstanding receivables at LIBOR + 200 basis points.
- Allow a credit period of 120 days.
- Reject the netting of payables against receivables due to insufficient details.

The Tribunal emphasized that receivables constitute a separate international transaction and that interest must be imputed if receivables are realized beyond the agreed period. This decision aligns with the amendment to Explanation to Section 92B, which includes any debt arising during the course of business as an international transaction.

---